WELCOME TO GENDER-FREE DANCING! A Historical Perspective
4th Revision 10-12-2011
Music and dancing have been a part of our human existence for a long time. Who can sit idly by with a great tune playing and an addictive rhythm filling the room with energy?
The idea of dancing using non-gender or global terminology may be new to some people, but if you look back in history, there are lots of fascinating accounts of same gender coupling and bending the roles within social dance culture. Dancing and gender has a rich, diverse, and entertaining story to tell!
Until recently, this part of dance history has often been unheard, glossed over or dismissed as irrelevant. However, this history provides an opportunity to understand the social aspects that dancing fulfilled in society. It also fills in the gaps about the reality of our social culture and gives us a diverse and accurate account of the human condition from a social context of that time, rather than though the eyes of our cultural norms today.
Modern day interest in gender-free dancing came as a direct response from dancers in the gay community who challenged their leadership to come up with a solution to help make traditional dancing feel more accessible, inclusive and relevant in their social structure. From there this idea has spread in different ways to the mainstream of the dance community and has started to have an affect on their dancing, particularly with younger dancers. The philosophy of gender-free dancing, much like the stories of our past, show that living traditions only stay rich and alive by finding ways to adapt to the needs of our changing society.
Gender-free dancing is a lot of fun and has the potential to provide a great learning experience for new dancers, as well as create a new challenge for experienced dancers. This form of dancing increases the potential connections dancers can make on the floor, with all genders dancing together in mixed and same gender combinations. Dancers who swap roles or dance gender-free regularly tend to look at the structure of the dance from a global rather than individual perspective which provides a venue for improving dancing skills and understanding the importance of each role in making the dance satisfying for everyone. Unlike the conventional dance model, this is not about dancing with half the room. It is about being inclusive and creating a safe and satisfying dance experience for everyone who comes to the dance.
A case in point, I’ve had conversations with older folks where we discovered that we were both into contra dancing – the running theme being, “Oh, you contra dance too? Perhaps we met at a dance somewhere, oh, but you are a man (or woman – someone of the same gender) so we may never have met.” I see gender-free dancing as having the potential to change this perspective on how we dance today.
A quote from the late Carl Wittman, founder and role model of the gender-free English and Scottish country-dance movement in Oregon during the 1970s sums this up beautifully:
“The country dance form can be thought of as an exquisite vessel, in itself beautiful in shape, yet highly abstract. We can choose to fill this vessel with whatever meaning we like. If we like, we can pursue a particular friendship; we can rejoice in a sense of community; we can see in the music and the dance the highest of spiritual values; we can see it as good fun. The dance is all of these and greater than all of them.”
Historical examples of same gender dancing in different cultures
Early Ritual and Tribal Dances
There are accounts of mixed and same gender dancing all through history, even in early tribal cultures. There are many accounts of dance rituals that were segregated by gender. Men had their particular rituals as did women. Much of this had to do with celebrations and cultural events within a community, such as the rite of passage to adulthood, becoming engaged, married, having a baby, a death, etc. International folk dances from eastern Europe and the Balkans have dance traditions specific to gender, though in most folk dance communities in America, everyone dances them.
Early English and Celtic Traditions
Morris and sword dances from Celtic roots were traditionally danced by men only. It hasn’t been until recently that there have been mixed or women only teams. In 2003 while on a ritual sword dance tour with the Gay Blades, in England, I was speaking to some of the men who are part of the official “Morris Ring.” They reported that only the all male teams were still officially recognized.
Dancing masters in English court traditions often taught the dances to men and women in gender segregated settings. At that time there was much stigma attached to dancing with someone of the opposite gender with whom you had not been formally introduced, but very little stigma attached to two men or two women dancing together. Typically it was at the formal evening ball where men and women came together to dance. The strict rules of society and social etiquette made dancing one of the only socially acceptable places where one was allowed to touch, flirt or otherwise make your desires known and to become better acquainted with someone of the opposite gender.
Queen Elizabeth the 1st had her own tradition of women dancing together in the court, purely for their own pleasure, and for hers.
FRONTIER, COWBOY DANCES AND THE WILD WEST (1820s – 1900)
As people moved west in the United States, so did their traditions of dance. Dancing was one of the few entertainments that could travel easily. Many men, usually single or otherwise out on their own, were the driving force of exploring the new frontier, staking land claims, or looking for gold. The lack of women at that time did not stop dancing from happening or men from dancing with each other.
While doing research on “men dancing together”, I ran into an interesting character, Ned Kelly who was an outlaw and gang leader in the Australian Bush country during the 1850s.
One article in particular mentions dancing as a part of trying to prove by circumstantial evidence whether or not Ned was gay:
[picture right man with beard]“The speculation that Ned Kelly was gay has periodically arisen over many decades, but had never been proven. Researchers have found no evidence to indicate that Ned was homosexual, and this factor is reflected in the type of ‘arguments’ periodically used to support the idea. These arguments are unconvincing and circumstantial at best, particularly when put in an historical context. Arguments for this reasoning include:
- The gang members were said to enjoy wearing mens perfume or scent.’
- Gang members have been reputed to have worn womans clothes to evade detection by police.
- Gang members were said to dance with other men. For example: At Glenrowan before the siege Dan chose to dance with the hostage Thomas Curnow, and, oral history says that Ned danced with a policeman at a race-day picnic during the days of his outlawry.
- These ‘arguments,’ coupled with the fact that these men spent months at a time in the bush together with no female company, have given rise to the idea that one or all of the gang members were gay.
- It was not uncommon for men to dance with each other in Colonial times, particularly when there was a shortage of women to dance with. No stigma was attached to men dancing together and nothing sexual was interpreted by it.
- Being in the bush in entirely male company was, again, not uncommon for the times and so can be easily dismissed as an indication of homosexuality. The lack of women in the bush was more of a matter of pragmatism that anything else. Women were under heavy social pressure and mores in Victorian times, and such free behavior as riding around un- chaperoned in the bush with a group of men, even at the best of times would most likely have branded the women ‘loose.’ It was simply not viewed as ‘respectable’ behavior for women, and, no matter how ‘innocent’ the incident, would have had social repercussions and consequences for the woman involved. Therefore, women in such situations would have been rare, and probably limited to relatives.”
To see this article, go to the URL address:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200216195344/http://www.bailup.com/historyMarriage4.htm
This article emphasizes the lack of sigma attached to same gender dancing or contact in Australia, which was also representative of our views in America at that time. All of this began to change rapidly after the civil war. By the late 1880s research on human behavior by Freud and others in his field shifted what had been considered innocent or irrelevant same gender social connections to viewing these interactions as suspect to unnatural acts between two men or in some cases, two women.
The Mormon (1840s thru 1870s)
During the mid 1800s the Mormon church held dances for teens segregated by gender as a way to keep the sinful thoughts of lust from entering recreational activities. Same gendered dancing was a necessity because it fulfilled a need. Being gay was a completely foreign idea to most people in this era. It simply did not exist. Those who would dare to talk about this possibility did so behind closed doors or in hushed voices. Men dancing together for pleasure and for women to do the same was not uncommon.
Men Dancing together in the Mining Camps of the West (mid 1800s and later)
There are accounts of men dancing together in the mining camps that sprung up in the exploration of the west. This drawing is a case in point:
The man dancing the woman’s role is wearing a woman’s hat and a frame that was used on a hoop skirt.
John Burrows adds to this reference:
From: Leila J. Rupp, A Desired Past: A Short History of Same-Sex Love in America, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999
A 1922 western novel described a raucous all-male dance in a mining camp: “A roar of laughter came from the celebrating miners and all eyes turned their way. Sinful and Hank were dancing to the music of a Jews harp and the time set by stamping, hob-nailed boots. They parted, bowed, joined again, parted, curtsied and went on, hand in hand, turning and ducking, backing and filing, the dust flying and the perspiration streaming down.”*
(from Chapter 3: Worlds of Men, Worlds of Women)
*Clarence Ulford, Tex (New York: Burt, 1922)
The Civil War – (men dancing together) (1860s)
In our research, we found a number of pictures, drawings and stories of Civil War soldiers dancing together. John Burrows reports that in some of his research that he viewed one such photograph of a group of General Custer’s soldiers (enlisted men) dancing in a room together, while the officers wives look on. It would have been improper for the officers wife to dance with enlisted men. John also stated reading accounts of men who drew straws as to who would lead and who would dance in the woman’s role.
The Grand Army of the Potomac in their barracks
The Cowboy and Saloon Dances of the late 1800s and early 1900s
There are diaries and pictures on the topic of Cowboy dances (Square and Couple dances) of the American Frontier, that were done by men in saloons. Early on as the pioneers went west there were places where few women could be found —and the few that there were would not frequent such an establishment! Though most of these men would have preferred dancing with women, the lack of women did not stop them from enjoying this recreation. There are also accounts of men who did not fit in with the urban rules and lifestyle that decided to go west so as not to marry, or to enjoy the company of other men. These all male dances were nick named “Stag Dances”.
“Cow Boy Dance. Stag” – circa 1900
URBAN LIFE AND THE BALLROOM
The Formal Ballroom (1860s)
John Burrows points out that in a ballroom etiquette handbook of that time, it was stated: “Men shall not dance together when there are women in the room who are waiting for partners…” which leads us to believe that it was not so uncommon for men to occasionally dance together, otherwise, why would anyone have need to comment on this at all? Its interesting too they don’t say men can’t dance together, only that it is improper to do so if there are women without partners.
John also states that none of this was mentioned in the later manuals, particularly by the 1890s. This likely had to do with the changing social views on same gender contact influenced by Freuds research as well as the beginning of more an overt and more intentional homosexual movement afoot in some circles, as we shall now see.
PHOTOS FROM COLLEGE YEARS 1890s – 1920
Man in a Ball Gown – Brown University 1908
Dancing Girls
The New York City Drag Balls of the 1890 – 1930
Gay Waltz Ball c.1890, NYC
George Chauncey, Gay New York: The Making of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940, Flamingo: Hammersmith, London, 1995
Charles Nesbitt, a medical student from North Carolina who visited the city around 1890, took the slummers tour with a friend. As he later recalled, he visited several beer gardens on the Bowery where “male perverts, dressed in elaborate feminine evening costumes, sat for company’ and received a commission on all the drinks served by the house to them and their customers.”
Such men dressed in male attire at the Slide, he discovered, but still sat for company as their transvestite counterparts did elsewhere. Intrigued, Nesbitt asked one of the men, known as “Princess Toto,” to join his table; to his surprise, he found the fellow “unusually intelligent” and sophisticated. Princess Toto, he quickly decided, was ‘the social queen of this group” and “had pretty clear cut ideas about his own mental state and that of his fellows.” Nature had made him this way, Toto assured the young medical student, and there were many men such as he. He indicated his pride in the openness of “my kind” at places like the Slide, calling them “superior” to the “perverts in artistic, professional and other circles who practice perversion surreptitiously.” “Believe me,” the student remembered him commenting, “there are plenty of them and they are good customers of ours.”
Sensing the medical students interest, Toto invited him to attend a ball at Walhalla Hall, one of the most prominent of the many Lower East Side halls that neighborhood social clubs rented to hold their affairs. Nesbitt went and discovered some five hundred same-sex male and female couples in attendance, “waltzing sedately to the music of a good band.”
Along with the male couples there were “quite a few… masculine looking women in male evening dress” dancing with other women, many of whom seem to have impressed the student as being of “good” background. “One could quite easily imagine oneself,” he recalled with amused incredulity, “in a formal evening ball room among respectable people.” *
As the medical student discovered, the Bowery resorts were only the most famous element of an extensive, organized, and highly visible gay world.
(from Chaper 1, The Bowery as Haven and Spectacle)
* Nesbitt memoir(1938), 106-7. On the use of Walhalla Hall for balls by other clubs, see Moss, American Metropolis, 171-73; Harlow, Old Bowery Days, 370, 426, 436; Asbury, Gangs of New York, 270.
The Double Life, Camp Culture, and the Making of a Collective Identity
George Chauncey, Gay New York: The Making of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940, Flamingo: Hammersmith, London, 1995
Tenement Dance Parties in NYC [1920s]
Parties, whether held in palatial penthouses or tiny tenement flats, constituted safe spaces in which a distinctive gay culture was forged…. The empowerment some lesbians and gay men felt in such an environment was indicated by the behavior of people attending a ‘womens party’ (as it was called) in a Harlem tenement on West 137th Street in 1928 – and by the response an investigator got to his interrogation of a lesbian (or “bull-dagger”) there.
Gladys Bentley, the “Bull Dagger” who sang the Blues! Circa 1920s
http://www.queerjitterbugs.com/jazz_def.htm
Page not found!!
Fifteen lesbians and five gay men were in attendance, all African-American. “The men were dancing with one another,” the investigator reported, “and the women were dancing with one another and going through the motions of copulation…and a number of the women had their dresses pulled up to their thighs.” Asked by the investigator to explain the character of the party, the hostess, a thirty-five-year-old woman who sold drinks to the partygoers, explained matter-of- factly that it was a “freakish party, everybody in here is supposed to be a bull dagger or a c .” Exclaiming that he was “neither” and that “I like mine in a normal way,” the investigator approached one woman, demanding “Are you one of these so-called things here or are you a normal, regular girl?” The woman, he reported with some amazement, defiantly pointed out: “Everybody here is either a bull dagger or faggot and I am here,” to which the investigator could only reply, “Some logic.” One of the men then tried to pick him up.
(from Chapter 10, The Double Life, Camp Culture, and the Making of a Collective Identity)
Other quotes of Drag Balls in NYC [1920s]
“Attended by celebrities and thousands of onlookers, drag balls were held throughout the year. The biggest were held at Harlems Manhattan Casino, later renamed the Rockland Palace.
Invitations made it clear that a ball would be gay by making suggestive references to ‘Tom Boys and Girls’ and the like.”
Gay men thus drew on a long tradition when they began organizing their own masquerades – or drags, as they usually called them – in the late nineteenth century. Like most gay institutions, gay drag balls did not emerge sui generis in the gay world, but were sub cultural adaptations of the institutions and social practices of the dominant culture. Like most of the establishments frequented by gay men, originally they were neither organized by them nor exclusively homosexual in patronage, but rather were places that for some reason tolerated their presence.
Minnesota College Womans Dance, circa 1910
In 1896 a doctor reported being told that “ ‘the Fairies’ of New York,” a group he thought must be a secret society, organized balls like those in Europe where “men adopt the ladies’ evening dress.” In the 1910s and 1920s, one group of gay men sponsored an annual drag at the Little Beethoven assembly room in the rear of a saloon on East Fifth Street near the Bowery, and another held an annual affair at a hall near Columbus Circle. By the mid-1920s, the Villages Webster Hall was the site of an annual [gay and lesbian] drag ball as well as numerous other masquerades attended by homosexuals. Small drags were sponsored in the late twenties and early thirties by the proprietors of out-of-the-way dives, such as Franks Place in Brooklyn, where gay civilians in drag danced with sailors from the nearby Navy Yard at dances held every two weeks.
The popularity and social cachet of the drags grew tremendously during the 1920s, when the general cultural ethos engendered by Prohibition and the laissez-fairs attitude of the police under the administration of mayor Jinny Walker tended to sanction such flouting of convention. By the late 1920s, six of seven enormous affairs were staged every year in some of the citys largest and most reputable halls, including Madison Square Garden and the Astor Hotel in midtown, the Manhattan Casino (later renamed the Rockland Palace), the Alhambra, and the Savoy Ballroom in Negro Harlem, and the New Star Casino in Italian Harlem. As we have seen, the Hamilton Lodge ball held every February in Harlem drew thousands of dancers and spectators and was the largest and best-known such event in the city. By the beginning of the thirties some observers remarked that New Yorks drag balls had surpassed those of Chicago and New Orleans in size and opulence, and that the city rivaled Berlin in its tolerance of such affairs.
One observer described the scene at a 1933 ball:
On the floor of the hall, in every conceivable sort of fancy dress, men quaver and palpitate in each others embrace. Many of the “effeminates” are elaborately coiffured, in the powdered head dresses of the period of Madame Pompadour. They wear the billowy, ballooning skirt of that picturesque pre-guillotine era… [O]thers wear the long, tight- fitting gowns which were a recent vogue… [while] still others wear the long, trailing skirts and the constricting corsets of the 1880s – yards of elaborately furbelowed material, frou-frouing behind them, when space permits.
As the growth of same-sex dancing suggests, many men found attending the balls to be an intoxicating experience, their “one-night-a-year freedom.” Some were emboldened by the thrill of gathering with hundreds of other openly gay men at an event celebrating their style and grace, and they left the balls unwilling, at least for a moment, to accept the usual constraints on their behavior. Rather than hide on their way home from the balls, some refused to bundle into cabs but marched daringly through the streets. In 1929 two twenty-five-year-old hotel telephone operators leaving a ball sauntered up Broadway to a restaurant near their apartment on Seventy- second Street. Attired in a “Spanish shawl and a beautiful red flaming dress” and other womens clothes, according to Variety, they attracted a crowd, which turned hostile and followed them into the restaurant, “almost causing a small riot.” They had to “rescued” by a patrolman who took them to a police station, where they almost caused another riot by asking a newspaper reporter for a powder puff.
The number and size of New Yorks drag balls in the 1920s and 1930s indicates the cohesion and scale of the gay world in those years. The very fact that hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of gay people attended them provides singular evidence of the vigor and extent of the social ties that bound gay men, since such large-scale events simply could not have been organized without the existence of the elaborate social networks that constituted the gay subculture. The fact that participants traveled hundreds of miles to attend the balls, and that others could compare New Yorks balls to those of Chicago, New Orleans, and Berlin shows that New Yorks gay world was part of a larger gay subculture.
While the balls reflected the existence of an extensive gay subculture, they also extended the reach of that subculture. Although many of the gay friendship circles in which individuals were involved were overlapping, others were wholly separate, and none were large enough to bring more than a fraction of the citys gay men into contact with one another. The innumerable gay social networks based in restaurants and private party circuits constituted gay society, but they linked men to a collective gay world in only an abstract way. The balls made the existence and scope of that world manifest. In a culture hostile to gay men, the balls confirmed their numbers by bringing thousands together. In a world that disparaged their culture, it was at the drag balls, more than any place else, that the gay world saw itself, celebrated itself, and affirmed itself.
(from Chapter 10, The Double Life, Camp Culture, and the Making of a Collective Identity)
The Argentine Tango (1900 – 1930s)
Recently, as a part of a renewed interest in the Tango, there have been a number of articles written on the topic of the all male tango dances of the early 1900s in Argentina. Here is a bit of information I found on this topic:
Tango is fundamentally a dance of equals – there is much less of the traditional lead and follow found in most partner dancing. Tango is a conversation between two people. Much of this can be traced back to the origins of the dance.
Back in the 1920s and 1930s, men outnumbered the women 4 to 1, which not only meant that men frequently danced together in the brothels, but it also meant that women could be picky about who they chose to dance with. In order to improve, or learn, your only choice as a man was to dance lady to a gent who was considered ‘better’. In this way you understood the ladies role and became a better ‘lead’ and a better dancer. Because you had two men dancing together frequently, there was a shift in the balance of power. Men had to dance as equals, both getting chance to shine’ and neither being dominated by the other. When the men then danced with women, who were so unique and special’, this allowance remained – treating the woman as an equal control in the shape of the dance. This first true equality still exists today, with the man suggesting moves, the lady responding – but also having her own allowance for decoration, embellishment and variations which the ‘gent’ has to respect and allow for.
There is also some writing that there was an early gay undercurrent to what was taking place:
The secret gay history of the Argentina extends into the tango – a dance born of the immigrant slums, where homosexuality seemed tolerated as one more expression of difference. It was always there, just below the surface, waiting like a ghost, casting its spell, unseen. My father tells me that when he was very young, in the ’20s and ’30s, there was much talk of this in Argentina.
To understand tango, the lifeblood of Buenos Aires, one must visit two neighborhoods, old underbellies of the city before she fought to compete with the best of Europe and North America. The old port of La Boca lies along the bay like Rio de la Plata. La Boca is Spanish for mouth, and like the real orifice, it was how Argentina communicated with the world, swallowing millions of immigrants into itself, and then speaking back of her riches product and soul. Buenos Aires residents call themselves Portefios, forever associating themselves with this area.
One must think back to the turn of the last century, imagining the noise of carts and horses, the smell of Italian cooking drifting with the sounds of Caruso through the windows. In the midst of all this, representing the odd coexistence of saints and sinners as can only be in a Catholic nation, there were dozens of brothels. Men, sweaty and frustrated from the factories, paid in hot anticipation with pesos as dirty as the pleasures in the rooms above them.
To while away their time, they held one another, pressed against each others stubbly olive flesh, sensually, violently stroking each other. This was the tango, a dance so obscene that a woman, even in a brothel, could never dance it. That early mix of violence, sensuality, and a hidden gay sensibility was not solely associated with tango.
In “Hombre de la Esquina Rosada,” or the “Man on the Pink Corner,” Borges mentions dapper gangsters known as compadritos who kill at the slightest provocation but who adorn themselves with feminine touches like boutonnieres, high-heeled boots, and polished style. Under this anything-goes mentality, Marcelo Suntheim, Cigliuttis lover and the CHA secretary, told me that “in this context, it is possible” that a gay subculture existed in Buenos Aires.
http://www.globalgayz.com/argentina-news.html http://www.dancethenightaway.org.uk/reading/articles/040216tango2.shtm
It was also noted that any man who dared to dance with (or worse steal’) the male tango partner of another man in the brothel risked being killed.
THE WAR YEARS (1930s & 1940s)
Two girls dancing together, circa 1938
Young women dancing together at a WYCA rural summer camp, 1944
Queer Jazz Dance History – (late 1920s – 1950)
http://www.queerjitterbugs.com/jazz_def.htm
There is a delightful site on line called: “Swing our way! – Queer Jitterbug”. On this website is the following description of an active subculture of homosexuals dancing together in the Charlestown, Big Band and Swing era in Harlem and at the Savoy Ballroom in New York City. Here are some excerpts from that site:
By the 1920s Harlem’s nightlife, for African Americans and even whites had emerged as a center of Black American music, literature and art; known culturally as the Harlem Renaissance. The Jazz Age offered Harlem a license that combined with both art and sexual ambiguity to members of their own sex. In Harlem the Jazz Age brought a period of political and intellectual ferment. Many of the leading figures were primarily inclined towards members of their own sex. They were “In The Life” as they called it in Harlem (from an essay by Margaret Graham 1998).
Advertised largely by word of mouth to those “in the life,” Queer nightlife thrived in Harlem. Greenwich Village and Harlem were the city’s main areas that countenanced homosexual gatherings. Richard Bruce Nugent, himself gay, recalled that the two bore many similarities… You just did what you wanted to do. Nobody was in the closet. There wasn’t any closets.”
2 enlisted men, one from the army, the other the navy, dance the Fox-Trot together (early 1940s)
The most spectacular homosexual events were the costume balls held at the cavernous Rockland Palace on 155th Street. “Of course, a costume ball can be a very tame thing,” reported the gossipy Black weekly The Interstate Tattler, “but when all the exquisitely gowned women on the floor are men and a number of the smartest men are women, ah then, we have something over which to thrill and grow round-eyed.”
These drag balls were reported in the Black press and surrealistically dramatized in Americas first unashamedly Homosexual novel, Charles Henri Ford and Parker Tyler’s “The Young and Evil” (1933).
‘Not all the guests were homosexual; many came to gawk. These onlookers ascended a gold-banistered staircase to the box seats that ringed the huge ballroom and looked down on the Grand March of ersatz divas promenading beneath a colossal crystal chandelier and a sky-blue ceiling. The women mostly dressed in drably colored loose-fitting men’s suits (rarely a tuxedo) while the men outdid themselves as extravagant Señoritas in black lace and red fans; as soubrettes in backless dresses and huge spangles; as debutantes in chiffon and rhinestones; and as a creature called “La Flame” who wore only a white satin stovepipe hat, a red beaded breast plate, and a white sash.’
The Savoy Ballroom also hosted gala drag balls, where the sartorial achievements were given prizes. (Artist “Sheriff” Bob Chanler, hostess Muriel Draper, and Carl Van Vechten comprised one panel of judges, and they awarded first prize to a man who wore only a cache-sex, silver sandals, and apple-green paint).
The full length story on this site is really fascinating, and can be found at the URL address at: http://www.queerjitterbugs.com/jazz_def.htm
Information on this site gathered was gathered from several sources. The following are a few of such resources:
http://members.tripod.com/%7Elaurencefrommer/celebrity/celebrity2bentley.html
http://frontpage.erie.net/tex/jazz.htm
http://www.darmstadt.de/kultur/musik/jazz/
http://www.101pop.com/ch2.html
http://www.thewildparty.net/wp.s.party2.html
Gay Black Jazz Action: http://www.soulforce.org/nolainvite2.html
Urban Sophisticates: Devoted to the Jazz Ages cultivation of an elegant Homosexual esthetic!
HOMOSEXUAL AND LESBIAN NIGHTLIFE from article on The Harlem Renaissance. Steve Voce: Scratching the Surface. Vanity Thy Name Is Hajdu, in: Jazz Journal, 52/6 (Jun.1999), p. 14-15
There is a feature article: Homosexual relationship between Ellington and Strayhorn.
From Zora Hurston bio Lesbian in the life 1925 -27: Josephine Baker, Gladys Bentley, Bessie Smith, Zora Hurston, and Ma Rainey.
Scottish Regiment during the war – Reel of the 51st Division
During World War II, the 51st Division of the Scottish regiment was captured and sent to a German prison camp. It was there that those men in the regiment got together, danced and brought to life one of the most famous and loved of the Scottish country dances: “The Reel of the 51st Division”:
“The short, active service life of Lieutenant J.E.M. ‘Jimmy’ Atkinson of the 7th Battalion Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders came to an abrupt end at 3pm on June 5, 1940.
Surrounded by enemy soldiers near the French town of Saigneville on the River Somme with a life expectancy measured in minutes, the 26-year-old scrambled to his feet, hands in the air and surrendered to five years of captivity as a prisoner of war in Germany. Had the German marksman been fractionally more accurate, the world would have been deprived of one of the most popular Scottish country dances ever devised.
For Mr. Atkinson, of Alloa, Clackmannanshire, and his contemporaries in pre-war Scotland, country dancing was part of everyday life. Later, as he and thousands of his fellow Highlanders were being marched 1,000 miles through Holland and into Germany in June 1940, his thoughts often strayed back to the dances he had attended. The tramp of the marching feet took on the rhythms of the Strathspeys, reels and jigs to which he had whirled his fiancée around the floor.
Years later he was to remember: ‘I started thinking about dance tunes to keep my mind clear of grizzly thoughts, and I began to get this idea for a dance.’ At the core of the dance was the cross of St Andrew and the flash, or badge, of the Highland division to which his regiment belonged.
At Oflag V11C, Laufen castle near Salzburg, he joined a reel club formed by Lieutenant APJ ‘Peter’ Oliver of the 4th Battalion Seaforth Highlanders. The two men discussed the dance forming in Mr Atkinsons mind, and, with the help of Lt Col Tom Harris Hunter, of the Royal Army Service Corps, a former chairman of the Perth branch of the Scottish Country Dance Society, worked out the dance that is essentially the same reel today.
On Hallowe’en 1941, in Oflag V11B at Warburg, Westphalia, Major General (later Sir) Victor Fortune, officer commanding the 51st, approved the name The 51st Country Dance (Laufen Reel).
The dance became an immediate success in wartime Britain. The then Queen, now Queen Mother, persuaded the Scottish (later Royal) Country Dance Society to include it in its book of dances, even though it did not conform to its standards.”
The tradition, to this day, is that this dance is traditionally only in a set of men only, as it was in the prison camp by the men of the 51st division
Information from this article came from: http://www.electricscotland.com/music/wardance.htm
Jewish Dancing Culture
Jewish dance culture has long had a tradition of men dancing together and women dancing together in segregated grous. This is particularly true in Orthodox Jewish dance culture, particularly during weddings and other celebrations, as it was considered far more acceptable to keep the sexes apart, which is also prevalent in Middle Eastern culture today.
Metrosexuality
This was a brief fad in our culture around 2000. In the “Urban Dictionary”:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Metro%20Sexual&defid=1268055
One definition further defines this as: a “Modern enlightened, sort of renaissance man.
Secure and confident, capable and cool, typically well educated and stylish. Heterosexual with a twist, not gay by any means, but he probably has a few gay friends, and can easily be mistaken for gay by rednecks and jock types. The only straight guy in a fabric store or antique shop who is not being dragged there by a woman.”
It was mentioned in some of these articles that in this culture, its OK for straight men to dance together.
WELCOME TO GENDER-FREE DANCING! A Historical Perspective
4th Revision 10-12-2011